Legal Position Analysis of Shareholders Who Did Not Make Full Deposit in Limited Liability Company Case Study of PT Agen Gas in Central Java
Keywords:
Legal standing, shareholder, dividend distributionAbstract
There is a clear boundary between the corporation and its owners, which is not the same as shareholders. Capital that can be approved, placed, or paid up is one of the components of a company's articles of association. Article 33 paragraph (1) of the Limited Liability Company Law also stipulates that a full deposit of 25% of the authorized capital is required. To emphasize common legal occurrences, it is known that shareholders often fail to fulfill their responsibilities in providing the working capital required by the deed of incorporation at the beginning of the company's existence. In this study, we looked at issues from closed cases that we collected from a number of gas agency LLCs in Central Java. Examine the rights of shareholders, procedures for proving ownership, and the legal position of shareholders who do not contribute all their capital. Writing systematically based on an analytical-critical approach and the nature of literature research is the research method used. The findings of this study also make it clear that shareholders who do not pay the full issued capital according to the agreement are in default in connection with the agreement to form a limited liability company, as stated in Article 33 of the PT Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. Limited. The people involved in this lawsuit have all been officially recognized as shareholders, which means that their names are now considered inseparable. Therefore, shareholders must acquire and maintain their rights as shareholders.
References
Purnamasari, Eka & Gunarto. 2018. Alasan Pembuatasan Dan Perubahan Ketentuan Terkait Modal Dalam Perseroan Terbatas. Jurnal Akta Vol. 3 No. 1. 203-210
Paskha Wardhana, Gideon. 2019. “Pertanggungjawaban Harta Pribadi Pemegang Saham Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia”. Arena Hukum. Vol. 12 No. 1.
Harahap, M. Yahya.2011. Hukum Perseroan Terbatas, Cet. 2. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Siti Hapsah Isfardiyana. 2015. “Tanggung Jawab Direksi Perseroan Terbatas dalam Pelanggaran Fiduciary Duty”. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Vol. 2 No. 1
W. Poespopradodjo, 1987, Logika scientifika: pengantar dialektika dan ilmu, Remadja karya, Bandung.
Soekanto, Soerjono & Sri Mamudji. 1983. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: suatu tinjauan singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Azhar, 2023. Kedudukan Hukum Pemegang Saham Yang Tidak Menyetor Penuh Modal Yang Ditempatkan Dalam Perseroan, Tesis Magister (Kenotariatan) Universitas Sumatera Utara, diakses dari Repositori Institusi USU http://repositori.usu.ac.id pada tanggal 01Oktober2023
Gautama, Sudargo. 1995. Komentar Atas Undang-undang Perseroan Terbatas (Baru) Tahun 1995 No. 1 Perbandingan Dengan Peraturan Lama, (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti). Hal. 31
Yani, Ahmad & Widjaja, Gunawan. 2003. Perseroan Terbatas, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada), hal. 49
Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas